Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2019-04-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2019-04-08 House Journal Page 0499 SB 89 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 89(JUD) "An Act relating to the Legislative Ethics Act; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT HCS(JUD) 3DP 1DNP 1AM 491 FN1: ZERO(LEG) 492 Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 89(JUD) (same title) 2019-04-08 House Journal Page 0500 There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 3, following line 4: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 4. AS 24.60.030 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (k) If a legislator requests to be excused from voting on a question before a house of the legislature under (g) of this section and is required by that house to vote on the question because a member of that house objects, the objection and the name of the member making the objection shall be recorded in the journal of that house." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Claman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 89(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Johnson, Kopp, LeDoux, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Neuman, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Lincoln, Merrick, Ortiz And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. 2019-04-08 House Journal Page 0501 Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 89(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 89(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 89(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 89(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Neuman, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Revak, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Jackson, LeDoux, Rauscher Excused: Lincoln, Merrick, Ortiz And so, HCS CSSB 89(JUD) passed the House. Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 89(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.